{"id":1023,"date":"2012-01-11T11:37:33","date_gmt":"2012-01-11T15:37:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shaviro.com\/Blog\/?p=1023"},"modified":"2012-01-11T11:37:33","modified_gmt":"2012-01-11T15:37:33","slug":"work-for-hire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shaviro.com\/Blog\/?p=1023","title":{"rendered":"Work for Hire?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here we go again. I was asked to sign a contract for an essay I have written, which is scheduled to appear in an edited collection. Let&#8217;s leave aside the fact that I wrote the essay &#8212; it was solicited for this collection &#8212; in summer 2010, and yet it will not appear in print until 2013. I think that the glacial pace of academic publishing is a real problem. But that is not what is bothering me at the moment. The contract that I was asked to sign, so that my essay could appear in an edited volume published by Oxford University Press, contained the following clause:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>WORK-FOR-HIRE. The Contributor acknowledges that the Publisher has commissioned&nbsp;the Contribution as a work-for-hire, that the Publisher will be deemed the author of the Contributior&nbsp;as employer-for-hire, and that the copyright in the Contribution will belong to the Publisher during&nbsp;the initial and any renewal or extended period(s) of copyright. To the extent, for any reason, that the&nbsp;Contribution or any portion thereof does not qualify or otherwise fails to be a work-for-hire, theContributor hereby assigns to the Publisher whatever right, title and interest the Contributor would&nbsp;otherwise have in the Contribution throughout the world.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><div>I found this entirely unbelievable, and unacceptable. Since when has original academic writing been classified as &#8220;work-for-hire&#8221;? It is possible, I suppose, that things like writing encyclopedia essays might be so categorized; but I have never, in my 30 years in academa, encountered a case in which primary scholarship or criticism was so classified. Is this something widespread, but which I simply haven&#8217;t heard about? I&#8217;d welcome information on this score from people who know more about the academic publishing situation than I do. But it seems to me, at first glance, that the Press is upping the ante in terms of trying to monopolize &#8220;intellectual property,&#8221; by setting up an arrangement that both cuts off the public from access and denies any rights to the henceforth-proletarianized &#8220;knowledge worker&#8221; or producer. I am unwilling to countenance such an abridgement of my ability to make the words that I have written more freely available.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>In any case, I wrote back to the Press as follows:<\/div>\n<div>\n<blockquote><p>I am unwilling     to sign the Contributor&#8217;s Agreement for my submission to the Oxford     Handbook of New Audiovisual Aesthetics as it is currently worded.&nbsp;In particular, I find section 2, defining my contribution as     work-for-hire, completely objectionable. I entirely reject the     notion that original academic work of this sort can be defined as     work-for-hire. I think that this is demeaning to academic     scholarship and disrespectful of intellectual labor.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>Section 2 of the contract further stipulates that even if &#8220;the     Contribution or any portion thereof does not qualify or otherwise     fails to be a work-for-hire, the Contributor hereby assigns to the     Publisher whatever right, title and interest the Contributor would     otherwise have in the Contribution throughout the world.&#8221; I find     this objectionable as well. Even if my contribution to the volume is     exempted from being considered work-for-hire, I am unwilling to sign     over my own rights to the publisher in this unlimited way. In     particular, I insist upon retaining, among other rights, the right     to make my contribution available for download on my own website and     the right to include this contribution at some later date as part of     a self-authored publication.&nbsp;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<div>I guess we will see what happens. I hope the Press backs down and offers more reasonable terms. If that doesn&#8217;t happen, I will simply have to withdraw my contribution from the edited volume. At some point, the essay will appear on my website for free download &#8212; whether because the publisher backs down and permits me to do this, or whether I give up on print publication.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Not getting the essay into print will mean that I won&#8217;t get the credit (or a line in my Vita) for the publication of an article that I am, in fact, rather proud of. This kind of credit matters in academia &#8212; salaries, among other things, are based on it. But as a full Professor with tenure I am in a rather privileged position: I can afford to lose the credit. The same is not the case for academics in more precarious positions &#8212; who might well be forced to sign away their rights in cases like this, because their jobs heavily depend upon their publication record, and one additional line on their Vita might make a major difference.&nbsp;<\/div><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here we go again. I was asked to sign a contract for an essay I have written, which is scheduled to appear in an edited collection. Let&#8217;s leave aside the fact that I wrote the essay &#8212; it was solicited for this collection &#8212; in summer 2010, and yet it will not appear in print &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shaviro.com\/Blog\/?p=1023\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Work for Hire?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-personal","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shaviro.com\/Blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1023","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shaviro.com\/Blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shaviro.com\/Blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shaviro.com\/Blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shaviro.com\/Blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1023"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.shaviro.com\/Blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1023\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1024,"href":"http:\/\/www.shaviro.com\/Blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1023\/revisions\/1024"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shaviro.com\/Blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shaviro.com\/Blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shaviro.com\/Blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}